From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClellan v. Wilson

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 27, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1930 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2007)

Summary

In McClellan v. Wilson, 2007 WL 666632 (E.D. Pa. 2007) the petitioner argued that he "was clearly denied appellate review of the complete record in Superior Court," which "abused its discretion when [an] incomplete record was used to affirm the Lower Court's decision."

Summary of this case from Jones v. Valdez

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1930.

February 27, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2007, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and respondent's opposition thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, and the parties' objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and

3. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue since a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the court is incorrect in dismissing the habeas petition without prejudice.


Summaries of

McClellan v. Wilson

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 27, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1930 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2007)

In McClellan v. Wilson, 2007 WL 666632 (E.D. Pa. 2007) the petitioner argued that he "was clearly denied appellate review of the complete record in Superior Court," which "abused its discretion when [an] incomplete record was used to affirm the Lower Court's decision."

Summary of this case from Jones v. Valdez
Case details for

McClellan v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:WILLY EARL McCLELLAN, Plaintiff, v. HARRY E. WILSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 27, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1930 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Valdez

This Court agrees with the reasoning of other district courts holding that such a claim is not cognizable. In…