From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClellan v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 2, 1943
11 So. 2d 871 (Ala. Crim. App. 1943)

Opinion

5 Div. 156.

January 12, 1943. Rehearing Denied February 2, 1943.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; Albert Hooton, Judge.

R.C. McClellan was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

J.W. Brassell, of Phenix City, for appellant.

Wm. N. McQueen, Atty. Gen., and John W. Vardaman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


This is a companion case to that of Leland Stanford Williams alias Fat Williams v. State, ante, p. 48, 11 So.2d 870.

There is no necessity of setting out the testimony adduced upon the trial in the court below. It is practically the same as the testimony in the Williams case, supra.

In this case also a severance was demanded and this man's trial resulted in his conviction of the offense of grand larceny and his punishment fixed at five years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

As stated by brief of Attorney General: "There appears no ruling in the entire transcript adverse to the defendant with the single exception of an objection by the State, to which the defendant failed to except, and which question was answered even though the State's objection was sustained. There were no refused charges, no motion to exclude the State's evidence, no request for the affirmative charge, no motion for a new trial."

It follows, therefore, there is nothing to review upon this appeal.

No point of decision being presented by exception, or apparent upon the record, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed. Woodson v. State, 170 Ala. 87, 54 So. 191.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McClellan v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 2, 1943
11 So. 2d 871 (Ala. Crim. App. 1943)
Case details for

McClellan v. State

Case Details

Full title:McCLELLAN v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 2, 1943

Citations

11 So. 2d 871 (Ala. Crim. App. 1943)
11 So. 2d 871

Citing Cases

Walker v. State

Sufficiency of the evidence is not presented, no request for affirmative charge or motion for new trial…