Opinion
06 CV 3801 (SJ).
January 16, 2007
Wilmer Hill Grier, Brooklyn, NY, By: Wilmer Hill Grier.
Buchanan Ingersoll PC, One Chase Manhattan Plaza, New York, NY, By: Timothy J. Fierst.
HSBC Bank USA, National Association, New York, NY, By: Meredith Leigh Friedman.
Rosner Nocera Ragone, LLP, Holtzville, NY, By: John P. Foudy.
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), prepared by Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. Judge Gold filed the Report on December 21, 2006, and provided the parties with the requisite amount of time to file any objections. No objections have been filed.
A district court judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine certain motions pending before the Court and to submit to the Court proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to the disposition of the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 10 days of service of the recommendation, any party may file written objections to the magistrate's report. Id. Upon de novo review of those portions of the record to which objections were made, the district court judge may affirm or reject the recommendations. Id. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985).
As mentioned, no objections were filed within the allotted time period. Upon review, the Court adopts and affirms the Report. The action is dismissed in its entirety.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.
SO ORDERED.