From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClary v. Fowlkes

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 2, 2009
328 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-8078.

Submitted: June 8, 2009.

Decided: July 2, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O'Grady, District Judge. (1:07-cv-01080-LO-TCB).

Joshua Brent McClary, Appellant Pro Se. William Wayne Muse, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; John Otto Easton, Virginia Margaret Sadler, Jordan, Coyne Savits, LLP, Fairfax, Virginia; Lisa Ehrich, Jeff W. Rosen, Pender Coward, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Joshua Brent McClary appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' summary judgment motions on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. McClary v. Fowlkes, No. 1:07-cv-01080-LO-TCB, 2008 WL 3992637 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 27, 2008; entered Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

McClary v. Fowlkes

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 2, 2009
328 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

McClary v. Fowlkes

Case Details

Full title:Joshua Brent McCLARY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOWLKES, Mrs., Nurse; Clark…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 2, 2009

Citations

328 F. App'x 275 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Wade

Generally, "[a] medical need serious enough to give rise to an Eighth Amendment claim involves a condition…