From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClaren v. Maxey

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 14, 2013
No. 60548 (Nev. Nov. 14, 2013)

Summary

In Ryan v. Maxey, 15 Mont. 100, 35 P. 228, it was held that an order taxing costs after the affirmance of a judgment by the supreme court upon return of the remittitur is a special order made after final judgment, and is therefore appealable.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Bullard v. District Court

Opinion

No. 60548

11-14-2013

RYAN MCCLAREN, Appellant, v. RYAN A. MAXEY, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing a tort action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas Smith, Judge.

On appeal, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to extend the service period and by dismissing his complaint, even though he had demonstrated good cause for failing to timely move for an extension based on his counsel's illness and his counsel's father's death. We, like the district court, are not unsympathetic to the difficulty of these circumstances. Nevertheless, based on our review of the parties' arguments and the appendix before us, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion for an extension of time and dismissing the action. In particular, the circumstances presented did not establish good cause for appellant's failure to file a motion to extend the service period for more than nine months after that period had expired. See NRCP 4(i) (mandating that an action be dismissed if the summons and complaint are not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed and good cause is not demonstrated for the failure to do so); Saavedra-Sandoval v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 126 Nev. ___, ___, 245 P.3d 1198, 1200 (2010) (explaining that this court reviews a district court order granting a motion to dismiss for failure to timely serve process for an abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

_______________, J.

Gibbons

_______________, J.

Douglas

_______________, J.

Saitta
cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge

M. Nelson Segel, Settlement Judge

Demetrios A. Dalacas

Laxalt & Nomura, Ltd./Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

McClaren v. Maxey

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Nov 14, 2013
No. 60548 (Nev. Nov. 14, 2013)

In Ryan v. Maxey, 15 Mont. 100, 35 P. 228, it was held that an order taxing costs after the affirmance of a judgment by the supreme court upon return of the remittitur is a special order made after final judgment, and is therefore appealable.

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Bullard v. District Court

In Ryan v. Maxey, 43 Texas 192 [ 43 Tex. 192], a minor acting by his guardian, and two married women, joined by their husbands, were parties to a proceeding instituted by one of the married women for partition of real estate in a guardianship, and all the parties interested were active agents in procuring a sale to be made.

Summary of this case from Poston v. Delfelder

In Ryan v. Maxey, 43 Tex. 195, the court said: "Whether the court in this case had or had not Jurisdiction to order the sale, under the facts set up in the answer and established by the evidence, the plaintiffs were estopped from enforcing their claim to the land."

Summary of this case from Allen v. Berkmier

In Ryan v. Maxey, 17 Mont. 164, [42 P. 760], the question was whether the expense of printing briefs in the supreme court was a legal charge as costs.

Summary of this case from Bond v. United Railroads of San Francisco
Case details for

McClaren v. Maxey

Case Details

Full title:RYAN MCCLAREN, Appellant, v. RYAN A. MAXEY, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

No. 60548 (Nev. Nov. 14, 2013)

Citing Cases

Stafford v. Harris

See facts held a ratification of a sale declared void when made. 3. Cases Adhered to. — Ryan v. Maxey, 43…

Wadkins v. Watson

E.F. Brown, for appellees Watson and Bean. — A deed which by its term would estop a feme sole and her privies…