From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClam v. Sposato

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 9, 2012
12-CV-0880 (SJF)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2012)

Opinion

12-CV-0880 (SJF)(WDW)

03-09-2012

WILLIAM McCLAM, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL SPOSATO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

FEUERSTEIN, District Judge:

Pursuant to the Court's February 13, 2012 Order of Consolidation, the Court has reviewed the instant complaint and finds that it relates to the subject matter of the Consolidated Action, Anderson, et al. v. Sposato. et al., 1 l-CV-5663 (SJF)(WDW). Accordingly, this action shall proceed in accordance with the Order of Consolidation, a copy of which is annexed hereto.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438,444-45, 82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed.2d 21 (1962).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and the Order of Consolidation to the pro se plaintiff at his last known address.

SO ORDERED.

____________

Sandra J. Feuerstein

United States District Judge

Dated: March 9, 2012

Central Islip, New York


Summaries of

McClam v. Sposato

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 9, 2012
12-CV-0880 (SJF)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2012)
Case details for

McClam v. Sposato

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM McCLAM, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL SPOSATO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 9, 2012

Citations

12-CV-0880 (SJF)(WDW) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2012)