From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClaine v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 13, 2018
Case No. 16-13950 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 16-13950

03-13-2018

Chante Chanell McClaine, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING 1/29/18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Chante Chanell McClaine brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits. The Court referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti for a report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (Doc. # 2), after which the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment (Doc. # 14, 15).

On January 29, 2018, Magistrate Judge Patti issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. # 17) wherein he recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, Grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and affirm the Commissioner's decision. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the R&R (Doc. # 17). The Court reviews these objections de novo. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

To properly object to the R&R, Plaintiff must do more than simply restate the arguments set forth in her summary judgment motion. Senneff v. Colvin, 2017 WL 710651 at * 2 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 23, 2017). She has not done so. Not only do Plaintiff's three objections rehash her prior arguments, but they are almost exact, word-for-word copies of those arguments simply rebranded as objections. These copy-pasted objections are akin to a general objection to the R&R and fail to provide specific reasons why Magistrate Judge Patti erred in his analysis. Thus, the Court shall overrule Plaintiff's objections. See Wallace v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 2016 WL 4409062 at * 2 (E.D. Mich. 2016).

Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objections and ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's January 29, 2018 R&R. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and 3) the ALJ's decision is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Sean F. Cox

Sean F. Cox

United States District Judge Dated: March 13, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on March 13, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Jennifer McCoy

Case Manager


Summaries of

McClaine v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 13, 2018
Case No. 16-13950 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2018)
Case details for

McClaine v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:Chante Chanell McClaine, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 13, 2018

Citations

Case No. 16-13950 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 13, 2018)

Citing Cases

Newton v. Saul

20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1502, 404.1513, 416.902, 416.913 (effective Sept. 3, 2013-March 26, 2017), and Social…