From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClain v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA WHEELING
Mar 7, 2019
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:14-CR-22 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 7, 2019)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:14-CR-22 CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-CV-30

03-07-2019

SHAWN MCCLAIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


(BAILEY)

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this day, the above-styled matter came before this Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone [5:18-cv-30 Doc. 4; 5:14-cr-22 Doc. 56]. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rules, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Mazzone for submission of a proposed report and recommendation ("R&R"). Magistrate Judge Mazzone filed his R&R on February 19, 2019, wherein he recommends petitioner's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [5:18-cv-30 Doc. 1; 5:14-cr-22 Doc. 53] be denied and dismissed because the motion is untimely.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), this Court is required to make a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge's findings to which objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour , 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce , 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Here, objections to Magistrate Judge Mazzone's R&R were due within fourteen (14) days of service, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). To date, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, this Court will review the R&R for clear error.

Upon careful review of the above, it is the opinion of this Court that the Report and Recommendation [5:18-cv-30 Doc. 4; 5:14-cr-22 Doc. 56] should be, and is, hereby ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated in the magistrate judge's report. Accordingly, this Court ORDERS that the petitioner's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [5:18-cv-30 Doc. 1; 5:14-cr-22 Doc. 53] is DENIED and DISMISSED because the motion is untimely. This Court further ORDERS that this matter be STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court and DIRECTS the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of respondent.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record herein and to mail a copy to the pro se plaintiff.

DATED: March 7, 2019.

/s/_________

JOHN PRESTON BAILEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

McClain v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA WHEELING
Mar 7, 2019
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:14-CR-22 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 7, 2019)
Case details for

McClain v. United States

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN MCCLAIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA WHEELING

Date published: Mar 7, 2019

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:14-CR-22 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 7, 2019)