From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClain v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 16, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-352 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-352

04-16-2012

RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR., Plaintiff v. MICHAEL LEANDER DAVIS, et al., Defendants


ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Smyser (Doc. 8), to which no objections have been filed, and upon independent review of the record, the court finds no error in the R&R and concludes that the R&R should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The R&R (Doc. 8) is adopted.
2. Plaintiff's § 1983 claims against Defendant Breeland are dismissed. Furthermore, we decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims against Defendant Breeland. Accordingly, all claims against Defendant Breeland are dismissed.
3. This case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Smyser for further proceedings.

_______________

William W. Caldwell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McClain v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 16, 2012
CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-352 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2012)
Case details for

McClain v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR., Plaintiff v. MICHAEL LEANDER DAVIS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 16, 2012

Citations

CIVIL NO. 1:12-CV-352 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 16, 2012)