From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McChesney v. Hogan

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 9, 2009
9:08-CV-1186 (NAM/DEP), 9:08-CV-1290 (DNH/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2009)

Opinion

9:08-CV-1186 (NAM/DEP), 9:08-CV-1290 (DNH/DEP).

March 9, 2009

David McChesney, 25527-604, CNY Psychiatric Center, Marcy, New York, Plaintiff, Pro Se.


MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER


Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services ("DOCS"), brought two actions for injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff moves in each case (Case No. 9:08-CV-1186, Dkt. No. 2; Case No. 9:08-CV-1290, Dkt. No. 3) for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order.

The motions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.3(c). Magistrate Judge Peebles issued a Report and Recommendation and Order (Case No. 9:08-CV-1186, Dkt. No. 4; Case No. 9:08-CV-1290, Dkt. No. 4) consolidating the actions, granting other nondispositive relief, and recommending denial of the motions for preliminary injunctive relief.

Plaintiff has filed an Objection (Case No. 9:08-CV-1186 (Lead Case), Dkt. No. 6) to the recommendation that this Court deny the motions for preliminary injunctive relief. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court reviews de novo those parts of a report and recommendation to which a party specifically objects.

The Court has carefully reviewed the entire file, including the 72 pages of exhibits attached to plaintiff's Objection. Upon de novo review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation and denies plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunctive relief.

It is therefore

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Case No. 9:08-CV-1186, Dkt. No. 4) of United States Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles is adopted; and it is further

ORDERED that the motions for injunctive relief (Case No. 9:08-CV-1186, Dkt. No. 2; Case No. 9:08-CV-1290, Dkt. No. 3) are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McChesney v. Hogan

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 9, 2009
9:08-CV-1186 (NAM/DEP), 9:08-CV-1290 (DNH/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2009)
Case details for

McChesney v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:DAVID McCHESNEY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL F. HOGAN, Commissioner, New York…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 9, 2009

Citations

9:08-CV-1186 (NAM/DEP), 9:08-CV-1290 (DNH/DEP) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2009)