From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCauslin v. Eckard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 8, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-982 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-982

08-08-2017

DONALD J. MCCAUSLIN, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT J. ECKARD, et al., Respondents


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 12) of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick, recommending that the court dismiss the petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner Donald J. McCauslin ("McCauslin"), wherein Judge Mehalchick opines that the release of McCauslin from custody renders his petition moot, and it appearing that no party has objected to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court being in agreement with Judge Mehalchick's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 12) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick is ADOPTED.

2. McCauslin's petition (Doc. 1) for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED as moot.

3. The court finds no basis to issue a certificate of appealability. See R. GOVERNING SECTION 2254 CASES R. 11(a).

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

McCauslin v. Eckard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 8, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-982 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2017)
Case details for

McCauslin v. Eckard

Case Details

Full title:DONALD J. MCCAUSLIN, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT J. ECKARD, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 8, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-982 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2017)