From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCaskill v. Nev. Dep't of Corrs.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 28, 2022
3:21-cv-00312-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00312-MMD-CLB

11-28-2022

JEREMY DALE MCCASKILL Plaintiff, v. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendant.

AARON D. FORD ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM P. SHOGREN, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT JEREMY DALE MCCASKILL PLAINTIFF, PRO SE


AARON D. FORD ATTORNEY GENERAL

WILLIAM P. SHOGREN, ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

JEREMY DALE MCCASKILL PLAINTIFF, PRO SE

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, and William P. Shogren, Deputy Attorney General, of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General; and Plaintiff Jeremy Dale McCaskill, pro se, under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, stipulate that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing their own attorney's fees and costs.

The Parties have resolved this matter in its entirety and agree that the Court may accordingly close the case, with prejudice. Any outstanding deadlines are considered moot.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the Clerk is directed to close the case.


Summaries of

McCaskill v. Nev. Dep't of Corrs.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 28, 2022
3:21-cv-00312-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)
Case details for

McCaskill v. Nev. Dep't of Corrs.

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY DALE MCCASKILL Plaintiff, v. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 28, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00312-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Nov. 28, 2022)