From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarty v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 14, 2012
Civil Case No.11-cv-00543-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Case No.11-cv-00543-REB-CBS

11-14-2012

TODD M. McCARTY, M.D., Plaintiff, v. DAVID DUNN, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Blackburn, J.

The matter is before me on the Motion To Reopen This Action and Dismiss it With Prejudice [#36] filed November 14, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the motion should be granted, that this case should be reopened, and that this case should then be dismissed with prejudice.

"[#36]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Motion To Reopen This Action and Dismiss it With Prejudice [#36] filed November 14, 2012, is GRANTED;

2. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, the clerk is DIRECTED to reopen this civil action; and

3. That this action is now DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs.

Dated November 14, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McCarty v. Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 14, 2012
Civil Case No.11-cv-00543-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2012)
Case details for

McCarty v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:TODD M. McCARTY, M.D., Plaintiff, v. DAVID DUNN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

Civil Case No.11-cv-00543-REB-CBS (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2012)