From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarty et al. v. McClendon

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 22, 1928
115 So. 839 (Fla. 1928)

Opinion

Decision Filed February 22, 1928.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for St. Lucie County; Elwyn Thomas, Judge.

Fee Liddon, for Plaintiffs in Error;

Nottingham Anderson, Russell L. Frink and Robert H. Anderson, for Defendant in Error.


This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., AND TERRELL AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

McCarty et al. v. McClendon

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B
Feb 22, 1928
115 So. 839 (Fla. 1928)
Case details for

McCarty et al. v. McClendon

Case Details

Full title:ANNA LARDNER McCARTY, DANIEL T. McCARTY, BRIAN K. McCARTY, JOHN MOORE…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Division B

Date published: Feb 22, 1928

Citations

115 So. 839 (Fla. 1928)
115 So. 839