From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarthy v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 23, 1963
12 N.Y.2d 922 (N.Y. 1963)

Summary

holding that the argument that an occurrence should be looked at from the standpoint of the victim rather than the wrongdoer should be addressed to the legislature

Summary of this case from State Farm Auto. Ins. v. McMillan

Opinion

Argued January 9, 1963

Decided January 23, 1963

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, DONALD P. GORMAN, J.

Vincent A. O'Neil for appellant.

John C. Kinney for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.


Summaries of

McCarthy v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 23, 1963
12 N.Y.2d 922 (N.Y. 1963)

holding that the argument that an occurrence should be looked at from the standpoint of the victim rather than the wrongdoer should be addressed to the legislature

Summary of this case from State Farm Auto. Ins. v. McMillan
Case details for

McCarthy v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification

Case Details

Full title:ANNIE L. McCARTHY, Appellant, v. MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT INDEMNIFICATION…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 23, 1963

Citations

12 N.Y.2d 922 (N.Y. 1963)
238 N.Y.S.2d 101
188 N.E.2d 405

Citing Cases

State Farm Ins. Co. v. Langan

( Roche v United States Fid. Guar. Co., 273 NY 473; Matter of Daniel [ Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp.], 181…

State Farm v. Langan

The purpose of an uninsured motorist endorsement is to help effectuate New York's compulsory automobile…