From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarthy Concrete Inc. v. Banton Constr. Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Aug 26, 2021
No. 2021-70837 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)

Opinion

2021-70837 Motion 532089

08-26-2021

MCCARTHY CONCRETE, INCORPORATED, Respondent, v. BANTON CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Appellants.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion for order directing pro hac vice admission of Martin A. Onorato, Esq., and Aniello P. Franzese, Esq., attorneys admitted in the State of Connecticut, pursuant to section 520.1 (a) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the motion is granted, without costs, and Martin A. Onorato, Esq., and Aniello P. Franzese, Esq., are admitted pro hac vice for the purpose of representing respondent upon the appeal.

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCarthy Concrete Inc. v. Banton Constr. Co.

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department
Aug 26, 2021
No. 2021-70837 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)
Case details for

McCarthy Concrete Inc. v. Banton Constr. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MCCARTHY CONCRETE, INCORPORATED, Respondent, v. BANTON CONSTRUCTION…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department

Date published: Aug 26, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-70837 (N.Y. App. Div. Aug. 26, 2021)