From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCarter v. New Rochelle Homestead Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

February, 1933.


Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, dismissing the complaint upon the merits, with costs. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made in conformity herewith. The plaintiff took title to this property with full knowledge of the restrictive covenant in question, which was exacted as part of the consideration for the conveyance to her, and it is, therefore, enforcible against her by the defendant in equity. ( Vogeler v. Alwyn Improvement Corp., 247 N.Y. 131.) Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

McCarter v. New Rochelle Homestead Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1933
238 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

McCarter v. New Rochelle Homestead Company

Case Details

Full title:MARION WALTON McCARTER, Respondent, v. NEW ROCHELLE HOMESTEAD COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1933

Citations

238 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)