From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCardle v. Placer Title Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
CIV. NO. S-11-1927 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CIV. NO. S-11-1927 GEB GGH PS

10-18-2011

MICHAEL B. MCCARDLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PLACER TITLE CO., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Defendant Placer Title Company's motion to dismiss presently is calendared for hearing on October 27, 2011. Having reviewed the record, the court has determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance in determining the pending motion. Accordingly, the court will not entertain oral argument, and will determine the motion on the record, including the briefing in support of the pending motion. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The October 27, 2011 hearing on the motion to dismiss, filed September 22, 2011, is vacated; and

2. The motion is submitted on the record.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

McCardle v. Placer Title Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
CIV. NO. S-11-1927 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

McCardle v. Placer Title Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL B. MCCARDLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PLACER TITLE CO., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

CIV. NO. S-11-1927 GEB GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)