From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCardle v. Fisher

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 30, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv37/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 30, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv37/MCR/EMT.

July 30, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated June 30, 2008 (Doc. 10). The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

McCardle v. Fisher

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jul 30, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv37/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 30, 2008)
Case details for

McCardle v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:JAMES McCARDLE, Petitioner, v. SCOTT FISHER, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jul 30, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv37/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jul. 30, 2008)