From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCameron v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jul 23, 2015
CASE No. 8:14-CV-3038-T-27TGW (M.D. Fla. Jul. 23, 2015)

Opinion

CASE No. 8:14-CV-3038-T-27TGW

07-23-2015

RICHARD DONALD MCCAMERON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The plaintiff, acting pro se, filed this lawsuit on December 4, 2014, seeking review of a denial of a claim for Social Security benefits. The plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2), and that request was granted on December 5, 2014 (Doc. 5).

This matter comes before the undersigned pursuant to the Standing Order of this court dated January 5, 1998. See also Local Rule 6.01(c)(21). --------

This court issued a Related Case Order and Track One Notice on January 6, 2015 (Doc. 6), which required review and certification of compliance with Local Rule 1.04(d) by the plaintiff within 14 days. The plaintiff did not respond to that Order.

On May 21, 2015, an Order to Show Cause was entered (Doc. 7), which directed the plaintiff to respond within 14 days regarding plaintiff's failure to effect service on the defendant, and further warned the plaintiff that noncompliance may result in dismissal of the case. As of this date, there is no record in the court file to indicate that the plaintiff has responded to that Order.

Rule 4(m), Fed.R.Civ.P., provides that service of the summons and complaint must be made within 120 days after the filing of the complaint or the case is subject to dismissal. This case was filed more than 229 days ago, and service has not yet been accomplished in this case. Because the time allowed by Rule 4(m) has elapsed without service, it appears that dismissal is warranted for the plaintiff's failure to effect service, absent a showing of good cause for such failure. This report and recommendation shall serve as notice to the plaintiff of the proposed dismissal.

For these reasons, I recommend that this action be dismissed, unless the plaintiff, in response to this report and recommendation, shows good cause for his failure to effect timely service.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/_________

THOMAS G. WILSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DATED: JULY 23, 2015

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within fourteen days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).


Summaries of

McCameron v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jul 23, 2015
CASE No. 8:14-CV-3038-T-27TGW (M.D. Fla. Jul. 23, 2015)
Case details for

McCameron v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DONALD MCCAMERON, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2015

Citations

CASE No. 8:14-CV-3038-T-27TGW (M.D. Fla. Jul. 23, 2015)