From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCallum v. Horlacher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 22, 2016
Case No. 2:14-cv-00459-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Jun. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cv-00459-RFB-CWH

06-22-2016

JAMES MCCALLUM, Plaintiff, v. SEAN HORLACHER, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Sean Horlacher's Motion for Order to Show Cause. ECF No. 54. In his motion, Horlacher seeks an order directing Plaintiff James McCallum to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for abandonment. Horlacher attaches a letter to his brief, purportedly from McCallum, in which McCallum states that he no longer wishes to participate in this case and will not be accepting mail from opposing counsel or the Court. In addition, the Court's docket reflects that McCallum refused to accept a copy of the Court's Order issued on May 17, 2016 when it was mailed to him at High Desert State Prison. See ECF No. 53.

"It is within the inherent power of the court to sua sponte dismiss a case for lack of prosecution." Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 496 (9th Cir. 1984). A court may also dismiss an action for failure to comply with any of its orders. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) ("If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it"); Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002) (listing the factors courts must consider when deciding whether to dismiss a claim for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order). Based upon the information provided in Horlacher's motion, it appears McCallum no longer wishes to prosecute this action.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff James McCallum shall show cause, in writing, no later than July 7, 2016 why this case should not be dismissed due to his apparent abandonment of his claim. Failure to respond could result in sanctions, including dismissal of his case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the dispositive motion deadline is STAYED pending further order of the Court. If Plaintiff provides a satisfactory reason why this case should not be dismissed, the Court will issue an order setting a new dispositive motion schedule. The discovery deadline shall remain at June 27, 2016.

DATED: June 22, 2016.

/s/ _________

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II

United States District Judge


Summaries of

McCallum v. Horlacher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 22, 2016
Case No. 2:14-cv-00459-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Jun. 22, 2016)
Case details for

McCallum v. Horlacher

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MCCALLUM, Plaintiff, v. SEAN HORLACHER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cv-00459-RFB-CWH (D. Nev. Jun. 22, 2016)