From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCalley v. Boyle

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Jun 22, 2021
Civil Action 3:21-CV-668-S-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 22, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21-CV-668-S-BK

06-22-2021

DAMARIS PLAISANT MCCALLEY v. JANE BOYLE, et al.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case [ECF No. 9]. Plaintiff filed an objection [ECF No. 10] (“Objection”). The District Court reviewed de novo those portions of the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to which objections were made, and reviewed the remaining proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error.

Plaintiff objects, in part, that the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation refer to her as a man, when she is, in fact, a woman. See Objection 3. The Court therefore modifies the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation to refer to Plaintiff as a woman.

The Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs remaining objections and ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as modified by the Court.

The Court DENIES Plaintiffs February 25, 2021 Motion to Appoint Counsel [ECF No. 11]. Plaintiff has not shown that exceptional circumstances require the appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

McCalley v. Boyle

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Jun 22, 2021
Civil Action 3:21-CV-668-S-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 22, 2021)
Case details for

McCalley v. Boyle

Case Details

Full title:DAMARIS PLAISANT MCCALLEY v. JANE BOYLE, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Jun 22, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 3:21-CV-668-S-BK (N.D. Tex. Jun. 22, 2021)