From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCall v. Transit

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 3, 2011
CASE NO. C10-5564RBL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C10-5564RBL.

March 3, 2011


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Waive Fees [Dkt. #29]. Plaintiff Michael McCall seeks leave to appeal in forma pauperis. He is appealing this Court's denial of his Motion for Reconsideration of the Court Order denying his Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

Plaintiff's Motion [Dkt. #29] is DENIED. First, the form used by Plaintiff to demonstrate his inability pay for fees and costs does not provide the detail required by Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(1). And, second, the appeal is frivolous. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing pro se.

Dated this 3rd day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

McCall v. Transit

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Mar 3, 2011
CASE NO. C10-5564RBL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 3, 2011)
Case details for

McCall v. Transit

Case Details

Full title:MIKE McCALL, et al, Plaintiff, v. INTERCITY TRANSIT, et al, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Mar 3, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C10-5564RBL (W.D. Wash. Mar. 3, 2011)