From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCall v. Peters

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
May 12, 2003
Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-2247-D (N.D. Tex. May. 12, 2003)

Summary

exercising supplemental jurisdiction because, among other reasons, “the Court is familiar with the merits of [plaintiff's] claims and has spent a substantial amount of time reviewing the pleadings and researching the legal issues involved, and all parties have expended time and effort in presenting the merits of the case to the Court”

Summary of this case from S.N.B. v. Pearland Indep. Sch. Dist.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-2247-D

May 12, 2003


ORDER


After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the February 18, 2003 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions are correct. It is therefore ordered that the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge are adopted, and defendants' Randall Johnson's and City of living's October 4, 2002 motion to recover their attorney's fees is denied.

SO ORDERED.

ORDER

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, and the February 18, 2003 findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the magistrate judge, and having considered plaintiff's March 28, 2003 objections, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's conclusions and recommendation are correct. It is therefore ordered that the conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge, including the part of the recommendation that relates to evidentiary matters, are adopted, and defendants Scott Peters, Michael D. Scott, and City of Coppell's April 17, 2002 motion for summary judgment is granted.

Because the court is deciding a motion for summary judgment, it has neither adopted nor made findings of fact.

SO ORDERED.

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set out in orders filed August 28, 2001 and today, it is ordered and adjudged that plaintiff's actions against defendants Scott Peters, Michael D. Scott, and City of Coppell are dismissed with prejudice.

These defendants' taxable costs of court, as calculated by the clerk of court, are assessed against plaintiff.

Because this judgment dismisses the remaining claims and defendants in this case, this is a final judgment, and the clerk of court shall terminate this action statistically.


Summaries of

McCall v. Peters

United States District Court, N.D. Texas
May 12, 2003
Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-2247-D (N.D. Tex. May. 12, 2003)

exercising supplemental jurisdiction because, among other reasons, “the Court is familiar with the merits of [plaintiff's] claims and has spent a substantial amount of time reviewing the pleadings and researching the legal issues involved, and all parties have expended time and effort in presenting the merits of the case to the Court”

Summary of this case from S.N.B. v. Pearland Indep. Sch. Dist.
Case details for

McCall v. Peters

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WAYNE McCALL, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT PETERS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas

Date published: May 12, 2003

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:00-CV-2247-D (N.D. Tex. May. 12, 2003)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Dall. Cnty.

Because, as discussed below, his claim is meritless, it would also impose unnecessary expenses on the court…

Starrett v. City of Richardson

Given Plaintiff's failure to state a claim for relief against Defendant in federal court, or otherwise show…