From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCall v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 11, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-12-11

In the Matter of Allah McCALL, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Allah McCall, Romulus, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Allah McCall, Romulus, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner became disruptive as he approached a gate emptying into the prison yard, and he struck a correction officer with his shoulder as he walked through the gate. He then punched the officer and had to be subdued. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct and creating a disturbance. He pleaded guilty to creating a disturbance and, at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, was found guilty of the remaining charges. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony of the correction officer who was involved in the altercation provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Alsaifullah v. Fischer, 118 A.D.3d 1239, 1240, 987 N.Y.S.2d 717 [2014], lv. denied24 N.Y.3d 906, 2014 WL 5368870 [2014]; Matter of Wright v. Fischer, 98 A.D.3d 759, 759, 949 N.Y.S.2d 819 [2012] ). Although petitioner and his witness offered a differing account of the incident, their testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see id.). Finally, petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer erred in denying his request for the medical records of the officer involved in the assault is unavailing, as there was no allegation that petitioner caused any physical injury to the officer. Under these circumstances, the medical records were irrelevant.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed. PETERS, P.J., ROSE, EGAN JR., LYNCH and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McCall v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Dec 11, 2014
123 A.D.3d 1267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

McCall v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Allah McCALL, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

Citations

123 A.D.3d 1267 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8699
996 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

Sylvester v. Venettozzi

Turning to the balance of the determination, the misbehavior report, related documentary evidence, including…

Killimayer v. Venettozzi

The misbehavior report, related documentary evidence and the hearing testimony provide substantial evidence…