From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCain v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 5, 2016
Civ. No. 1:12-cv-0789 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 5, 2016)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1:12-cv-0789

07-05-2016

AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN a/k/a JOHN MCCAIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Schwab

MEMORANDUM

Before the court is a report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge in which she recommends that Plaintiff John McCain's motion for summary judgment on the remaining issues be denied. (Doc. 335.) No objection to the report and recommendation has been filed. The report and recommendation is ripe for disposition.

McCain filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1.) After several reports and recommendations, the only remaining claim is an Eighth Amendment sexual abuse claim against Defendant Roegner. The magistrate judge found that McCain is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law because there are genuine issues of disputed material facts in this case. McCain himself acknowledged that there are disputed facts. (Doc. 325 at pp. 2, 3, 4 & 5.)

Based on the foregoing, the report and recommendation will be adopted.

s/Sylvia H. Rambo

SYLVIA H. RAMBO

United States District Judge Dated: July 5, 2016


Summaries of

McCain v. Wetzel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 5, 2016
Civ. No. 1:12-cv-0789 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 5, 2016)
Case details for

McCain v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:AMIR HAKIM MCCAIN a/k/a JOHN MCCAIN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 5, 2016

Citations

Civ. No. 1:12-cv-0789 (M.D. Pa. Jul. 5, 2016)