From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCain v. Dimon Bacorn

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 14, 2011
3:10-CV-766 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2011)

Opinion

3:10-CV-766.

January 14, 2011


DECISION ORDER


I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff commenced this action alleging employment discrimination claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII") and the New York State Human Rights Law ("Human Rights Law"). Defendants move to dismiss the Title VII claims brought against the individual defendants — Michael Shafer and Lenard Haines. Plaintiff, through counsel, has responded and correctly acknowledged that, in the Second Circuit, "individuals are not subject to liability under Title VII."Wrighten v. Glowski, 232 F.3d 119, 120 (2d Cir. 2000) ( per curiam); see Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295, 1313 (2d Cir. 1995) ("We now hold that individual defendants with supervisory control over a plaintiff may not be held personally liable under Title VII."), abrogated on other grounds by Burlington Indus. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 118 S. Ct. 2257, 141 L. Ed.2d 633 (1998).

II. CONCLUSION

IT IS SO ORDERED

GRANTED, DISMISSED.

DATED: January 14, 2011


Summaries of

McCain v. Dimon Bacorn

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 14, 2011
3:10-CV-766 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2011)
Case details for

McCain v. Dimon Bacorn

Case Details

Full title:JARROD McCAIN Plaintiff, v. DIMON BACORN, a New York Corporation, MICHAEL…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jan 14, 2011

Citations

3:10-CV-766 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2011)