From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCabe v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 1, 1895
34 Tex. Crim. 418 (Tex. Crim. App. 1895)

Opinion

No. 691.

Decided May 1, 1895.

Fornication — Living Together — Fact Case — Evidence Insufficient. — See fact's stated in the opinion which the court holds insufficient to sustain a conviction for fornication, under an information charging that the parties lived together, and had carnal intercourse with each other.

APPEAL from the County Court of Karnes. Tried below before Hon. W.A. LITTLE, County Judge.

Appellants were convicted of fornication, and their punishment assessed at a fine of $50 each.

The opinion sufficiently states the facts.

Bell Johnson, for appellants.

Mann Trice, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.


Appellants were convicted of fornication. The information charges the offense to have been committed by living together, and having carnal intercourse with one another. The parties went on the same train from Karnes City to Kenedy, a distance of a few miles, and there stopped at an hotel for dinner and supper, after which they left in a buggy. This was Tuesday night. They were not seen until Friday morning, when they appeared at the camp of one Burris, a short distance from Kenedy. The girl remained at this camp, where McCabe left her until the following day, when McCabe came for her, and they returned together to Karnes City. She spent that night in his private bedroom. McCabe notified an officer of her presence, and requested that some one be placed there, so that it would be seen that he did not occupy her room that night. It is left in doubt as to whether they occupied the same room, or not, on the night in question. This is the substance of the evidence. This conduct did not constitute "living together," as meant by the statute (Penal Code, article 337). Bird v. The State, 27 Texas Crim. App., 635; Ledbetter v. The State, 21 Texas Crim. App., 344.

The facts are insufficient to support the offense as charged in the information, wherefore the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Judges all present and concurring.


Summaries of

McCabe v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 1, 1895
34 Tex. Crim. 418 (Tex. Crim. App. 1895)
Case details for

McCabe v. the State

Case Details

Full title:H. T. McCABE AND JANE CORDWAY v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 1, 1895

Citations

34 Tex. Crim. 418 (Tex. Crim. App. 1895)
30 S.W. 1063

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Clear

Thus, jurisdiction attached to the justice court when relator appeared first before that court. See Cordway…

Cochran v. State

This question, like the one immediately above, has been many times decided. Baker v. State, 4 Tex.Crim. App.…