From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCabe v. 511 W. 232nd Owners Corp.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 2023
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 1592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

No. 17574 Index No. 802172/22E Case No. 2022-05809

03-23-2023

In the Matter of Maryann McCabe et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. 511 West 232nd Owners Corp., Respondent-Respondent.

Vernon & Ginsburg, LLP, New York (Yoram Silagy of counsel), for appellants. Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP, New York (Michelle P. Quinn of counsel), for respondent.


Vernon & Ginsburg, LLP, New York (Yoram Silagy of counsel), for appellants.

Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP, New York (Michelle P. Quinn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Renwick, A.P.J., Friedman, Scarpulla, Mendez, Rodriguez, JJ.

Judgment (denominated an order), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti, J.), entered on or about June 13, 2022, denying the petition to annul the determination of respondent cooperative board, dated October 27, 2021, which declined to transfer the shares and proprietary lease for the subject cooperative unit to petitioner, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The cooperative board's decision was made in furtherance of a legitimate corporate purpose, and was not "arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion" (CPLR 7803[3]; see Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp., 75 N.Y.2d 530, 542 [1990]). The cooperative legitimately applied the terms of paragraph 16 of the proprietary lease to find that petitioner was not the decedent's spouse and therefore required approval by the board prior to transfer of the proprietary lease and shares of the subject unit (see Hudson View Props. v Weiss, 59 N.Y.2d 733, 735 [1983]; see also Matter of Cadalzo v Russ, 195 A.D.3d 463, 465 [1st Dept 2021]). Furthermore, based on petitioner's tax returns and financial information provided on her application to transfer such shares, the cooperative offered a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for denying its approval (see Hirschmann v Hassapoyannes, 52 A.D.3d 221, 222 [1st Dept 2008]). Absent bad faith or discrimination, the board's decision is protected by the business judgment rule (see Matter of Levandusky, 75 N.Y.2d at 538).


Summaries of

McCabe v. 511 W. 232nd Owners Corp.

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 2023
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 1592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

McCabe v. 511 W. 232nd Owners Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Maryann McCabe et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. 511…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 23, 2023

Citations

2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 1592 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)