From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McBrien v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 14, 2013
No. 61344 (Nev. May. 14, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61344

05-14-2013

WILLIAM J. MCBRIEN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea of battery with the use of a deadly weapon resulting in substantial bodily harm constituting domestic violence and coercion. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.

Appellant William McBrien contends that the district court should not have accepted his guilty plea because he had plausible defenses to the criminal charges. However, a valid guilty plea constitutes an admission of all the facts necessary for a conviction, United States v. Cazares, 121 F.3d 1241, 1246-47 (9th Cir. 1997), and "results in forfeiture of those defenses not explicitly preserved by entering conditional guilty plea," United States v. Schweitzer, 454 F.3d 197, 205 (3d Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). McBrien has not challenged the validity of his guilty plea nor preserved these alleged defenses for appeal. See NRS 174.035(3). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

_______________, J.

Gibbons
_______________, J.
Douglas
_______________, J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge

George R. Carter

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

McBrien v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 14, 2013
No. 61344 (Nev. May. 14, 2013)
Case details for

McBrien v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. MCBRIEN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 14, 2013

Citations

No. 61344 (Nev. May. 14, 2013)

Citing Cases

State v. Samis

d in the loan of fifty thousand dollars for the Travises and Livingstons, there is a failure of proof and a…

State v. Rosenheim

A criminal statute must be strictly construed. There cannot be read into the statute what is not there. State…