From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McBride v. Industrial Accident Commission

Supreme Court of California
Mar 12, 1920
182 Cal. 407 (Cal. 1920)

Opinion

S. F. No. 9364.

March 12, 1920.

PETITION for rehearing application for Writ of Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission. Denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Theodore L. Breslauer for Petitioner.


The petition for a writ of review was denied in this matter upon the theory that the commission had the power to reserve, as it expressly did, the award for medical, surgical, and hospital treatment, to which it found the claimant entitled, pending the procuring of the necessary information and vouchers for a supplemental award. [1] The practice, perhaps, is not one to be commended, as a single final judgment covering all matters involved is the orderly method. It certainly could not be extended to allow supplemental awards for the purpose of correcting errors in the original award, as was attempted in Georgia Casualty Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 177 Cal. 289, [ 170 P. 625], the case principally relied on by petitioner. The case just cited is not in point upon the question here presented.

The petition for a rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

McBride v. Industrial Accident Commission

Supreme Court of California
Mar 12, 1920
182 Cal. 407 (Cal. 1920)
Case details for

McBride v. Industrial Accident Commission

Case Details

Full title:GLENN McBRIDE, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Mar 12, 1920

Citations

182 Cal. 407 (Cal. 1920)
187 P. 1050

Citing Cases

Southern California Edison Company v. Industrial Accident Commission

Upon rehearing it appeared without conflict that no operation had been performed, that the employee had been…

Hindes v. Industrial Acc. Com

There is no question but that the original award wherein the Commission found the paralysis from which the…