From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McBride v. Guzina

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 5, 2022
8:21-cv-546-CEH-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

8:21-cv-546-CEH-AEP

01-05-2022

KEVIN MCBRIDE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN W. GUZINA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Charlene Edwards Honeywell United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's “Motion Request for Entry of Default Judgment on Defendant Daryl Niles” (Doc. 95), filed on October 12, 2021. In the motion, Plaintiff requests entry of default judgment against Defendant Niles for failing to answer Plaintiff's complaint. The Court, having considered the motion and being fully advised in the premises, will deny Plaintiff's motion for default judgment.

DISCUSSION

Plaintiff, Kevin McBride, proceeding pro se, sued Defendant Daryl Niles, along with 16 other Defendants, following Plaintiff's arrest at a PINK Concert at Amalie

Arena. Defendant Niles was the head of security for Amalie Arena. Plaintiff seeks default judgment against Defendant Niles because, according to Plaintiff, Niles is evading service, declining to waive service, and refusing to answer Plaintiff's complaint. Doc. 95. In response, Niles contends that Plaintiff did not timely serve him, nor has Plaintiff filed evidence to establish that service by mail was proper. Doc. 101. 1

The law in this Circuit makes clear that default under Rule 55 is a two-step process:

Under Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there is “a two-step procedure for obtaining a default judgment.” Deforest v. Johnny Chisholm Global Events, LLC, No. 3:08-cv-498, 2010 WL 1792094, *7 (N.D. Fla. May 4, 2010); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a), (b). First, the clerk must enter a party's default “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Second, after a default is entered, the party must then apply to the court for a default judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). As a result, “the clerk's entry of default must precede an application” for default judgment. Deforest, 2010 WL 1792094 at *7 (citing Fairman v. Hurley, 373 F.Supp.2d 227, 231 (W.D.N.Y. 2005)); Travelers Cas. & Surety Co. of Am., Inc. v. E. Beach Dev., LLC, No. 07-0347-WS-B, 2007 WL 4097440, *1 (S.D. Ala. Nov. 14, 2007) (“The point is that a clerk's entry of default must precede an application to the district court for entry of default judgment.”).
Frazier v. Absolute Collection Serv., Inc., 767 F.Supp.2d 1354, 1360 n.1 (N.D.Ga. 2011); see also 10A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2682 (3d ed. 1998) (“Prior to obtaining a default judgment under either Rule 55(b)(1) or Rule 55(b)(2), there must be an entry of default as provided by Rule 55(a)”). Here, Plaintiff moved for default judgment before obtaining a clerk's default under Rule 55(a). Thus, Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is premature and improper.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED: 2

1. Plaintiffs “Motion Request for Entry of Default Judgment on Defendant Daryl Niles” (Doc. 95) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED. 3


Summaries of

McBride v. Guzina

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jan 5, 2022
8:21-cv-546-CEH-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2022)
Case details for

McBride v. Guzina

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN MCBRIDE, Plaintiff, v. JOHN W. GUZINA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

8:21-cv-546-CEH-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2022)