Opinion
Argued May 10, 1927
Decided May 20, 1927
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Charles L. Craig for appellant.
Louis L. Archer and Elon S. Hobbs for respondents.
The provision of the contract that payment to the attorney shall be made in cash, though the property received by the client may be something other than cash, is inconsistent with an intention to make an equitable assignment.
The judgment should be affirmed with costs.
CARDOZO, Ch. J., POUND, CRANE, ANDREWS, LEHMAN, KELLOGG and O'BRIEN, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed, etc.