From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McAVOY v. DI LEO

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 22, 1964
43 Misc. 2d 164 (N.Y. App. Term 1964)

Opinion

April 22, 1964

Appeal from the County Court of the County of Westchester, JOHN H. GALLOWAY, J.

Howard H. Schrecke for appellants.

Fasso Belserene ( Thomas N. Fasso of counsel), for respondents.


Section 205-a Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law is not available to the plaintiffs in the situation here disclosed.

The order denying defendants' motion to dismiss the second cause of action in each complaint should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted.

Concur — BENJAMIN, GULOTTA and McDONALD, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

McAVOY v. DI LEO

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Apr 22, 1964
43 Misc. 2d 164 (N.Y. App. Term 1964)
Case details for

McAVOY v. DI LEO

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD V. McAVOY et al., Respondents, v. ANNA DI LEO et al., Appellants…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Apr 22, 1964

Citations

43 Misc. 2d 164 (N.Y. App. Term 1964)
250 N.Y.S.2d 444

Citing Cases

Kenavan v. City of New York

0 (a), and General Order No. 5 of the New York City Department of Sanitation — all of which impose a duty on…

Traver v. Saratoga Springs

The statute would upon its face and given a literal interpretation include as a potential liability any…