From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McArthur v. West Virginia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jun 8, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00208 (S.D.W. Va. Jun. 8, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00208

06-08-2020

TERRENCE ANTOINE MCARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On March 23, 2020, the Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 1) and a Complaint (Document 2). By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on March 24, 2020, the matter was referred to the Honorable Omar J. Aboulhosn, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.

On May 13, 2020, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 4). Therein, it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, dismiss the Plaintiff's Complaint, and remove this matter from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by June 1, 2020.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Document 1) be DENIED, the Plaintiff's Complaint (Document 2) be DISMISSED, and this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: June 8, 2020

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

McArthur v. West Virginia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Jun 8, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00208 (S.D.W. Va. Jun. 8, 2020)
Case details for

McArthur v. West Virginia

Case Details

Full title:TERRENCE ANTOINE MCARTHUR, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Jun 8, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00208 (S.D.W. Va. Jun. 8, 2020)