From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McArthur v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 12, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0582 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0582 GEB KJN P

08-12-2011

RANDALL McARTHUR, Petitioner, v. R. HILL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 28, 2011, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ."

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent's June 28, 2011 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, or he shall file an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

mcar0582.46h


Summaries of

McArthur v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 12, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-0582 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)
Case details for

McArthur v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:RANDALL McARTHUR, Petitioner, v. R. HILL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 12, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0582 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2011)