In McArdell v. Olcott (62 A.D. 127, 129) no fact was stated "indicating any change in the attitude of the plaintiff with reference to the conduct of this action which renders it essential that petitioner be admitted to protect his rights."
Summary of this case from Maas v. SullivanJune, 1906.
Motion granted upon conditions stated in memorandum per curiam. Settle order on notice.
In McArdell v. Olcott (62 A.D. 127, 129) no fact was stated "indicating any change in the attitude of the plaintiff with reference to the conduct of this action which renders it essential that petitioner be admitted to protect his rights."
Summary of this case from Maas v. SullivanFull title:Cornelius McArdell and Others v. Frederic P. Olcott and Others
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Jun 1, 1906
The mortgagee in good faith may lawfully agree to sell to the mortgagor. Wicker v. Hoppock, 6 Wall. 94, 98;…
Maas v. Sullivan( Brinckerhoff v. Bostwick, 99 N.Y. 185, 194.) In McArdell v. Olcott ( 62 A.D. 127, 129) no fact was stated…