From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McAlpine v. Donald A. Bosco Bldg., Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 29, 2015
869 N.W.2d 584 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 151256. COA No. 316323.

09-29-2015

Mark L. McALPINE, Lynette McAlpine, and Mark L. McAlpine Living Trust, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. DONALD A. BOSCO BUILDING, INC., Smedeson Steel & Supply Company, Inc., a/k/a Smede–Son Steel & Supply Co, Inc., Schwartz Plumbing, Inc., Genesee Cut Stone & Marble Company, K & R Concrete, Inc., Detroit Spectrum Painters, Inc., Rocwall Company, Stonework By Gulyas & Co, R & R Earthmovers, Inc., B & B Well Drilling, Inc., National Ladder & Scaffold Company, Inc., Professional Engineering Associates, Inc., Trucking Specialists, Inc., Beaver Stair Company, Delta Trim & Design, Inc., Franklin Floor Covering Plus, Inc., FMG Concrete Cutting, Inc., Get Rich Quik, Inc., Capital Stoneworks, L.L.C., Neilson Quality Homes, Inc., TM Wood Products, Mike Ottman Asphalt Paving, L.L.C., Dillman And Upton, Inc., Extreme Stone Solutions, L.L.C., Novi Insulation, Inc., Marine City Ceiling & Partition, Inc., and Ace Asphalt & Paving Company, Defendants–Appellees, and Watertite Company, a/k/a Water–Tite Company, Saturn Electric, Inc., National City Bank, Homeowner Construction Lien Recovery Fund, and National City Mortgage, Defendants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

McAlpine v. Donald A. Bosco Bldg., Inc.

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 29, 2015
869 N.W.2d 584 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

McAlpine v. Donald A. Bosco Bldg., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Mark L. McALPINE, Lynette McAlpine, and Mark L. McAlpine Living Trust…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 29, 2015

Citations

869 N.W.2d 584 (Mich. 2015)
498 Mich. 884

Citing Cases

McAlpine v. Donald A. Bosco Bldg., Inc.

The trial court did not err in denying plaintiffs' motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award, and,…