From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McAllister v. Johnson

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 3, 2022
1:19-CV-13 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-CV-13

10-03-2022

ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER, Plaintiff, v. NOLAN TERRANCE JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and served on the parties. The defendants filed objections. Doc. 72. In the Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge fully addressed the arguments made by the defendants in their objections, and the Court agrees that the defendants' interpretation of Heck v. Humphrey is incorrect. After de novo review, the Court adopts the Recommendation in full.

It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings, Doc. 58, is DENIED. The stay imposed by text order on February 4, 2022, is LIFTED, discovery may proceed, and the matter is referred to the Magistrate Judge to set a schedule for completion of discovery.


Summaries of

McAllister v. Johnson

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Oct 3, 2022
1:19-CV-13 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2022)
Case details for

McAllister v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER, Plaintiff, v. NOLAN TERRANCE JOHNSON, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 3, 2022

Citations

1:19-CV-13 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2022)