From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McAdoo v. Manwaring

United States District Court, D. Idaho
May 14, 2008
Case No. CV-07-469-S-BLW (D. Idaho May. 14, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. CV-07-469-S-BLW.

May 14, 2008


ORDER


The Court earlier ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee by March 31, 2008, and allowed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has filed an unacceptable amended complaint that is a jumble of standards of law and argument rather than a statement of the facts. In the future, Plaintiff is encouraged to use the pre-printed complaint forms available in the Prison Legal Resource Center insofar as possible and to follow the Court's Initial Review Order.

Plaintiff has asked the Court to reconsider his in forma pauperis request, but has filed only an old prison trust account statement (in January 2008, he filed a prison trust account statement from October 2007). Because Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee and failed to provide a current trust account statement, his case will be dismissed without prejudice to refiling a new action.

ORDER

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED without prejudice to filing a new action.

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider in Forma Pauperis Application is DENIED without prejudice for failing to file a current trust account statement.


Summaries of

McAdoo v. Manwaring

United States District Court, D. Idaho
May 14, 2008
Case No. CV-07-469-S-BLW (D. Idaho May. 14, 2008)
Case details for

McAdoo v. Manwaring

Case Details

Full title:BARRY L. McADOO, Plaintiff, v. TOM MANWARING, RANDY BLADES, CORRECTIONAL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Idaho

Date published: May 14, 2008

Citations

Case No. CV-07-469-S-BLW (D. Idaho May. 14, 2008)