From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McAdoo v. Alameda

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 31, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1209 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-1209 FCD KJM P.

August 31, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 7, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 7, 2006 are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant Sandberg is dismissed.


Summaries of

McAdoo v. Alameda

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 31, 2006
No. CIV S-03-1209 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2006)
Case details for

McAdoo v. Alameda

Case Details

Full title:KIM DAVIS McADOO, Plaintiff, v. ED ALAMEDA, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 31, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-03-1209 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2006)