In the present case, the chancellor's judgment reflects that in awarding attorneys' fees to Sara, he took into consideration that Sara filed nine contempt petitions against Greg. Although Greg was found in contempt only once prior to the final judgment, "this Court has upheld awards of attorney's fees in contempt actions even where there was no specific evidence regarding the attorney's fees that the moving party incurred related to the contempt." Dixon v. Olmstead, 296 So.3d 227, 235-36 (¶37) (Miss. Ct. App. 2020) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also McAdams v. McAdams, 261 So.3d 157, 165 (¶29) (Miss. Ct. App. 2018) (affirming a chancellor's award of $1,000 in attorney's fees even where "there was no specific evidence regarding the attorney's fees that [the wife] incurred related to [the husband's] contempt"). ¶65. For the foregoing reasons, we find that the amount of attorneys' fees awarded

However, this Court has upheld awards of attorney's fees in contempt actions even where "there was no specific evidence regarding the attorney's fees that [the moving party] incurred related to ... [the] contempt[.]" McAdams v. McAdams , 261 So. 3d 157, 165 (¶29) (Miss. Ct. App. 2018). In Heisinger , 243 So. 3d at 260 (¶47), "the only evidence to support [the father's] request for attorney's fees was his own testimony that he had incurred more than $35,000 in fees."