Opinion
Case No. 12-cv-1333-BTM-MDD
07-22-2014
ORDER
Federal courts have authority to address attorney conduct in litigation, and to that end may look, e.g., to the standards of professional conduct in the state where the court sits. See, e.g., In re Snyder, 472 U.S. 634, 645 n. 6 (1985); United States v. Seltzer, 227 F.3d 36, 40-42 (2d Cir. 2000); Alexander Interactive, Inc. v. Adorama, Inc., No. 12-cv-6608, 2014 WL 2968528 (S.D.N.Y. June 26, 2014 (slip op.). In California, Rule of Professional Conduct 5-210 governs the obligations of a member of the bar who knows or should know they will be called as a witness before a jury:
A member shall not act as an advocate before a jury which will hear testimony from the member unless:Cal. Rules of Prof'l Conduct R. 5-210 (2014). See also id. R. 1-100(A) ("Ethics opinions and rules and standards promulgated by other jurisdictions and bar associations may also be considered."); Kennedy v. Eldridge, 201 Cal. App. 4th 1197, 1204 (2011) (applying the broader Model Rule 3.7 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct of the American Bar Association).
(A) The testimony relates to an uncontested matter; or
(B) The testimony relates to the nature and value of legal services rendered in the case; or
(C) The member has the informed, written consent of the client. If the member represents the People or a governmental entity, the consent shall be obtained from the head of the office or a designee of the head of the office by which the member is employed and shall be consistent with principles of recusal.
Here, Annette Clark, Plaintiff's counsel, has been named as a trial witness by Defendant. The Court accordingly ORDERS Plaintiff or Plaintiff's counsel to file, within thirty days of the entry of this Order, a brief explanation of how Ms. Clark may testify and act as trial counsel consistent with Rule 5-210.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ
Chief Judge
United States District Court