From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MBO Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2012
467 F. App'x 892 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1446

05-09-2012

MBO LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BECTON, DICKINSON & COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

JOHN M. SKENYON, Fish & Richardson, P.C. of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant. LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were ALEXANDRA C. BOUDREAU and JOHN C. POLLEY, of Boston, Massachusetts.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 03-CV-10038, Judge Richard G. Stearns.

JUDGMENT

JOHN M. SKENYON, Fish & Richardson, P.C. of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was WILLIAM G. MCELWAIN, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were ALEXANDRA C. BOUDREAU and JOHN C. POLLEY, of Boston, Massachusetts.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, DYK and Prost, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

MBO Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
May 9, 2012
467 F. App'x 892 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

MBO Laboratories, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.

Case Details

Full title:MBO LABORATORIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BECTON, DICKINSON …

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: May 9, 2012

Citations

467 F. App'x 892 (Fed. Cir. 2012)