MBNA AMERICA BANK, NA v. ROMERO

Full title: MBNA AMERICA BANK, NA, Plaintiff, v. ROGER D. ROMERO, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 13, 2007

1:07cv0166 OWW DLB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2007)

Opinion

1:07cv0166 OWW DLB.

April 13, 2007

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

OLIVER WANGER, District Judge

Defendant Roger D. Romero ("Defendant"), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, removed the instant action from state court on January 29, 2007.

On March 1, 2007, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that the complained be DISMISSED on the grounds that Defendant wrongly attempted to remove an underlying arbitration proceeding to this Court. The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. Over thirty (30) days have passed and Defendant has not filed objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated March 1, 2007, is ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. The action is DISMISSED.

This terminates this action in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.