From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MB Moda Borse S.R.L. v. Marks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 3, 2022
202 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

15220 Index No. 651547/20 Case No. 2021–01987

02-03-2022

MB MODA BORSE S.R.L., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Lana MARKS et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Fox Horan & Camerini LLP, New York (Jami L. Mevorah of counsel), for appellant. Jason Levine, New York, for respondent.


Fox Horan & Camerini LLP, New York (Jami L. Mevorah of counsel), for appellant.

Jason Levine, New York, for respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Webber, Oing, Mendez, Higgitt, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alan C. Marin, J.), entered on or about October 30, 2020, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ cross motion under CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the action as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion denied, and the complaint reinstated.

The record presents an issue of fact as to whether defendants’ March 27, 2015 email acknowledged a debt and the obligation to pay it within the meaning of General Obligations Law § 17–101, thus taking the action outside the statute of limitations (see Hawk Mtn. LLC v. RAM Capital Group LLC, 192 A.D.3d 447, 448, 144 N.Y.S.3d 18 [1st Dept. 2021] ; Renk v. Renk, 188 A.D.3d 502, 503, 135 N.Y.S.3d 391 [1st Dept. 2020] ).


Summaries of

MB Moda Borse S.R.L. v. Marks

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 3, 2022
202 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

MB Moda Borse S.R.L. v. Marks

Case Details

Full title:MB MODA BORSE S.R.L., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Lana MARKS et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 3, 2022

Citations

202 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
158 N.Y.S.3d 572

Citing Cases

Cedar Capital Mgmt. Grp. v. Lillie

Here, Carr has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating that the time within which plaintiffs may sue has…