From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mazza v. Marcello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 2005
20 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-07075.

July 25, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, Donald Friedman, P.C., the plaintiff's attorney, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Aliotta, J.), dated July 23, 2004, which granted the motion of Jacoby Meyers, LLP, the plaintiff's former attorney, to determine an attorney's fee for legal services rendered by Jacoby Meyers, LLP, and directed it to pay Jacoby Meyers, LLP, the sum of $8,929.60, representing 40% of the total attorney's fee of $22,324.

Donald Friedman, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Mitchell Gorkin of counsel), nonparty-appellant pro se.

Finkelstein Partners, LLP, Newburgh, N.Y. (Terry D. Horner of counsel), for nonparty respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Cozier and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The issue of apportionment of an attorney's fee is controlled by the circumstances and equities of each particular case, and the trial court is in the best position to assess such factors ( see Juste v. New York City Tr. Auth., 5 AD3d 736; Ebrahimian v. Long Is. R.R., 269 AD2d 488). Contrary to the appellant's contention, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in awarding the former attorney 40% of the total legal fee, as such fee was based upon the amount of time spent on the case, and the nature of the work performed.


Summaries of

Mazza v. Marcello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 2005
20 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Mazza v. Marcello

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MAZZA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT MARCELLO, Defendant. DONALD FRIEDMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 25, 2005

Citations

20 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 6102
799 N.Y.S.2d 151

Citing Cases

Pyong Woo Ye v. Pasha

" ‘When there is a fee dispute between the current and discharged attorneys for the plaintiff in an action to…

Russo v. New York

There was no evidence that Zelman was discharged for cause so as to preclude her from a share of her charging…