From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mazza v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bridgeton

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 1966
219 A.2d 615 (N.J. 1966)

Opinion

Argued March 8, 1966 —

Decided May 9, 1966.

Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division.

Mr. William Gallner argued the cause for appellants ( Mr. Steven Z. Kleiner, on the brief; Messrs. Gallner Kleiner, attorneys).

Mr. David L. Horuvitz argued the cause for respondent, Mary Schrank. Mr. Arnold L. Bauer argued the cause for respondents the Mayor and City Council of the City of Bridgeton and the Planning Board of the City of Bridgeton.

Mr. Basil D. Beck, Jr., argued the cause for respondent the Board of Adjustment of the City of Bridgeton.


In this matter which was certified for disposition by us, the municipality granted a zoning variance to authorize construction of a garden apartment on land zoned against such structures. During pendency of the appeal the city amended the zoning ordinance in such fashion that garden apartments became a permitted use in the zone where the property in question is located. Under the circumstances, on the record before us the issue is moot, and therefore the appeal is dismissed. No costs.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO. — 6.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

Mazza v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bridgeton

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 9, 1966
219 A.2d 615 (N.J. 1966)
Case details for

Mazza v. Bd. of Adjustment of Bridgeton

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY J. MAZZA AND MARY ANN MAZZA ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 9, 1966

Citations

219 A.2d 615 (N.J. 1966)
219 A.2d 615

Citing Cases

Towles v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

Our scope of review of the Board's determination that there has been a material change of circumstances is…

Rapp v. Rapp

The Court believes that Mr. Marichal advised Plaintiff of the impact of the Antenuptial Agreement and that…