holding that a municipality has standing to challenge the zoning ordinance of a neighboring municipality upon demonstrating that its corporate interests and responsibilities are directly and adversely affected by the ordinance
Summary of this case from Town of Randolph v. Town of Stoughton, NoNo. 80-5525.
January 26, 1981, October TERM, 1980.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 629 F. 2d 870.
holding that a municipality has standing to challenge the zoning ordinance of a neighboring municipality upon demonstrating that its corporate interests and responsibilities are directly and adversely affected by the ordinance
Summary of this case from Town of Randolph v. Town of Stoughton, Nofinding "no evidence that the prosecution acted in bad faith . . . or overstepped the bounds of propriety and fairness" by making promise of informal immunity
Summary of this case from U.S. v. McGuireconsidering subpoena for documentary materials
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Hivelypermitting in camera review of statements of a government witness despite qualified journalistic privilege because of the unavailability from another source
Summary of this case from U.S. v. LoweFull title:MAZUS v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 26, 1981
Gronowicz would not be protected by a privilege, such as is afforded by typical press shield laws, merely to…
Williams v. ParkeThat the trial judge here likewise inquired, unwisely from our viewpoint, as to the jury count nevertheless…