From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mazurek v. Kelley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 20, 2015
No. 5:14-cv-439-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 20, 2015)

Opinion

No. 5:14-cv-439-DPM

10-20-2015

GAVINO PATRICK MAZUREK PETITIONER v. WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

Unopposed recommendation, No 9, adopted as supplemented. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Notes). The narrow exception created by Martinez and Trevino applies only to substantial claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Martinez v. Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309, 1320 (2012); Trevino v. Thaler, 133 S. Ct. 1911, 1921 (2013). The exception doesn't apply to Mazurek's claim that the trial court erred in denying his Rule 26 motion. No 9 at 7-8. Mazurek's petition, No 1, will be dismissed with prejudice. No certificate of appealability will issue. 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(1)-(2).

So Ordered.

/s/_________

D.P. Marshall Jr.

United States District Judge

20 October 2015


Summaries of

Mazurek v. Kelley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 20, 2015
No. 5:14-cv-439-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Mazurek v. Kelley

Case Details

Full title:GAVINO PATRICK MAZUREK PETITIONER v. WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2015

Citations

No. 5:14-cv-439-DPM (E.D. Ark. Oct. 20, 2015)